Uh-oh…Look who’s back. It’s me, and I’m plenty irritated. Here we are, over three years into the Iraq conflict, and I still hear the same old crap. “Do you think we should be in Iraq?” and/or the 9/11 conspiracy nut jobs. Today, let’s tackle the conspiracy nut jobs.
As a preface, those of you who know me are very aware that I spend a lot of time on the Internet. Probably too much time, but that is a discussion for another day.
At this moment, I am part of a Google discussion group. A Google group is much like any other discussion board, but with 2 neat little twists:
1. You have to be invited.
2. Instead of logging in to a site to view the ongoing discussion, each successive reply is e-mailed directly to you. This is incredibly convenient, but it can also eat up your daylight if you get too involved.
The group I’m in consists primarily of political discussion. Conservatives, (like me) square off against liberal whack job sad-sacks every day, and it gets to be pretty passionate. As always, I don’t take any crap from anybody, and I go out of my way to make sure everybody knows that.
Recently, a discussion was begun by a liberal member of the group in regard to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. His contention was that the towers were not brought down by the impacts of the airplanes, but by placed thermite charges, and that the superstructures of the buildings would have had to *melt* for them to collapse as they did. Anyone with moderately functioning grey matter knows that these theories are complete garbage, and as I said earlier, I have grown tired of these pointless discussions. As a matter of principle, I took this person (who shall remain nameless) to task. Enjoy.
(more…)
Popularity: 21% [?]
(3166 words, estimated 12:40 mins reading time)